If a website form matters to your business, daily testing is best (when possible). Testing weekly/monthly is still better than not at all, but the longer the gap between tests, the longer a broken form can go unnoticed.
The sooner you find out, the better
Reasons a form could break can include plugin updates, website changes, or even a change to a connected service. While the page may still look completely normal and still load, the form could be failing. If a form is only tested monthly, a failure could go on for weeks. With daily testing, the time between a problem appearing and your next scheduled check is much shorter.
Scheduled testing does not prevent a form from failing, and it is not continuous monitoring. Its purpose is to give you a regular signal so you can investigate sooner instead of discovering the problem later through a customer complaint or an unexpectedly quiet inbox.
Peace of mind comes from checking regularly
The purpose of automated form testing is peace of mind. That confidence is stronger when it is based on a recent successful test. For important contact, enquiry, quote, and lead forms, daily testing is a sensible default. Weekly and monthly schedules can still suit lower-priority forms or workflows where tests could create downstream work. The best choice is usually the most frequent schedule your process can comfortably support.
Daily testing is built into FormTester 365
Some form testing services meter individual test runs or make you manage a pool of test credits. FormTester 365 plans are based on the number of forms you monitor, not the number of scheduled test runs. To that end, daily testing is included in every plan.
Our scheduler makes it easy to choose daily, weekly, or monthly testing, but FormTester 365 was designed first for daily testing. You do not need to conserve tests for the end of the month or reduce useful coverage to stay within a test allowance.
Handling more frequent test notifications
Because a test submits the live form, it can trigger the form's usual email notifications and workflows. There can be concerns about the frequency of these notifications in clients' inboxes or business workflows.
One solution to this is conditional notifications. Many form plugins and form solutions support conditional notifications. Depending on the tool you use, you may be able to identify a test submission by a field value or test email address, then route it to a separate inbox or suppress notifications that do not need to be sent. Configure those rules carefully so the test still exercises the part of the submission process you intend to check. FormTester 365 will still detect success or failure and email you the results per your settings.
For client sites, a daily test email can also be useful rather than unwanted. Some clients appreciate a clearly labelled message arriving each day because it is visible reassurance that their form is being checked and is working. Agree on the notification workflow with the client, label test submissions clearly, and send them only to the people who find them valuable.
Choose the shortest useful gap
If learning about a failure tomorrow is better than learning about it next week, choose daily testing. If daily tests create a workflow you cannot reasonably manage, choose the next most frequent schedule and revisit the notification setup. The goal is simple: keep the gap between checks short enough that you can act before a form problem has time to cost you opportunities.
Compare plans with daily testing included or log in to review your form schedules.